Comparasion of Hagia Sophia and Selimiye in Context of Space Hierarchy Related to Privacy

Pınar KISA OVALI, Hatice KIRAN ÇAKIR, Damla ATİK, Selin ARABULAN
1.348 369

Öz


Abstract

Being a world heritage Hagia Sophia and Selimiye are symbol buildings having significant cultural, spatial and structural features. They both reflect the political ascendancy and magnificence of the century they were built besides challenging constructional approach. At the same time these buildings, reflecting their spatial hierarchy on building surfaces and textures, are the architectural works providing privacy conditions in spatial fiction and configuration also making feel of safety.

The aim of the study is to determine the similarities or differences of the two symbol buildings designed for different religious functioning and rituals in terms of space hierarchy. Within this scope “Privacy” is defined as basic concepts; degrees of space hierarchy are specified in the context of “public, semi-public, semi-private, private” spaces and are analyzed on the two buildings’ plan drawings comparatively containing arrangements, limits and lower degrees. he

 

 


Anahtar kelimeler


Space Hierarchy, Privacy, Hagia Sophia, Selimiye.

Tam metin:

PDF (English)

Referanslar


REFERENCES

Altman, I., Chermes, M., (1986). Cultural Environment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Erinsel Önder, D., (1995). Kent Otellerinde Mekânsal Kademelenmenin Değerlendirilmesi İçin Bir Yöntem (Unpuplished PhD. Thesis). Yıldız Technical University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, İstanbul

Gür, Ş. Ö., (1996). Mekan Örgütlenmesi, Gür Publishing, Trabzon

Kısa Ovalı, P., (2006). Simge Yapı Selimiye Camiinde Mekan Kademelenmesi. 2.nd International Architect Sinan Symposium, Proceedings, Trakya University, Edirne, s.107-116

Kısa Ovalı, P., Kıran Çakır, H., Atik, D., Bozacı, M. K., Dönmez, S. and Arabulan, S., (2013). Dünya Mirası Kapsamında Selimiye ve Ayasofya Camilerinin Mekânsal ve Boyutsal Kademelenmesinin Karşılaştırılması. Trakya University, Unpuplished Scientific Research Project, No:2010/118, Edirne

Kleinbauer, W.E., White, A. and Matthews, H., (2004). Ayasofya, Translated: Handan Cingi, Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, Scala Publishers, İstanbul

Kuban, D., (1997). Sinan’ın Sanatı ve Selimiye. 1th Edition, Tarih Vakfı Yurt Publishing, İstanbul

Kuban, D., (2000). İstanbul Bir Kent Tarihi: Bizantion, Konstantinopolis, İstanbul, Tarih Vakfı Yurt Publishing, İstanbul

Mango, C., (2006). Bizans Mimarisi, Rekmay Inc., Ankara

Müller-Wiener, (2007). İstanbul’un Tarihsel Topografyası, 3rd Edition, Translated: Ülker Sayın, Yapı Kredi Cultural Activities Arts and Publishing Inc., İstanbul

Rapoport, A., (1977). Human Aspects of Urban Form, Pergamon, Newyork

Sommer, R., (1996). Personal Space: The Behavioral Basis of Design, Prentice Hall Inc., Engbewood Cliff, New Jersey

Şengül, E., “Edirne ve Selimiye”, Personal Photo Archive

Ünlü, A., (1998). Çevresel Tasarımda İlk Kavramlar, İstanbul Technical University Faculty of Architecture Printing Office, Sayı: 1604, İstanbul