Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Tasarım stüdyosunda açık mimarlığı tartışmak: Atölye 1 ve Ankara Örneği

Year 2024, , 173 - 183, 15.08.2024

Gülşah Güleç , Zeynep Uludağ

https://doi.org/10.51664/artium.1348084

Abstract

Açıklık, mimarlığın 21. yüzyılın dünyasının yeni mekansal, sosyal, kültürel ve çevresel koşullarına uyum sağlaması için önemli bir niteliktir. Son yıllarda ortaya çıkan ve tüm dünyayı etkisi altına alan COVID-19 pandemisi sosyal mesafe kavramıyla birlikte açıklığın ve açık mekânın yeniden mimarlığın gündemine yerleşmesine yol açmıştır. Pandeminin yanı sıra ekonomik krizlerin, ekolojik problemlerin ve çok çeşitli teknolojik gelişmelerin yaşandığı bugünün dünyasında açık mimarlık, bu dünyanın yeni dinamiklerini ve gerçekliklerini anlamamızı ve ona uyumlanmamızı sağlayabilecek önemli bir yaklaşım gibi görünmektedir. Bu nedenle, Ankara’da Gazi Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Mimarlık Bölümü’nde faaliyetlerini sürdüren Atölye 1’de 2021-2022 yıllarının proje teması Açık Mimarlık olarak belirlenmiştir. Atölyede açıklık, mimarlığın yerle ve toplumsal gerçekliklerle yeni bir biçimde ilişkilenmesini sağlayan yere özgü bir nitelik olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Böylece açık mimarlık teması altında yürütülen projelerin başkent Ankara’nın son yıllarda öne çıkan problemlerine ve potansiyellerine duyarlı olacak ve kentte açık mekân kullanımını yaygınlaştıracak biçimde tasarlanmasına önem verilmiştir.

Keywords

mimari tasarım stüdyosu mimari proje açık mimarlık açık mekan açık yapı

References

  • Akcan, E. (2018). Open Architecture: Migration, Citizenship and The Urban Renewal of Berlin-Kreuzberg by IBA-1984/87. Birkhauser.
  • August, T., Shin, H., & Tunca, T. I. (2013). Licensing and Competition for Services in Open Source Software. Information Systems Research, 24(4), 1068–1086.
  • Behnisch, G. (1997). Günter Behnisch for an “Open” Architecture: A Discussion of Collaboration and the Design Process. Perspecta, (28), 65–77.
  • Behnisch, G. (2005). For an Open Architecture. (Re)Reading Perspecta: The First Fifty Years of the Yale Architectural Journal, 1(1), 688-691.
  • De Carlo, G. (2005). An Architecture of Participation. (Re)Reading Perspecta: The First Fifty Years of the Yale Architectural Journal, 1(1), 396-400.
  • Eco, U. (1989). The Open Work. Harvard University Press.
  • Fabbrini, S. (2022). Ventotene and Gorizia: Opening the Panopticon. Open Architecture: Tradition, Possibilities and Shortcomings. Footprint: Delft Architecture Theory Journal, 16(2), 21-40.
  • Gausa, M., Guallart, V., Müller, W., Soriano, F., Porras, F. & Morales, J. (2003). The Metapolis Dictionary of Advanced Architecture: City, Technology and Society in the Information Age. Actar Publishing.
  • Gehl, J. (2007). Public Spaces for a Changing Public Life. In C. Ward Thompson, P. Travlou (Eds.), Open space: People space (pp. 3-10). Taylor & Francis.
  • Gregory, A., Livesey, G., & Weddle, R. (2013). Introduction: Boundaries in Architectural Education. Journal of Architectural Education (1984-), 67(2), 171–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.2013.817168
  • Hansen, O., Hansen, Z. (1961). The Open Form in Architecture [CIAM ’59]. Verlag.
  • Hernández, J. M., Kömez Dağlıoğlu, E. (2022). Open Architecture and its Discontents. Open Architecture: Tradition, Possibilities and Shortcomings. Footprint: Delft Architecture Theory Journal, 16(2), 3-8.
  • Hirsch, A. B. (2014). From “Open Space” to “Public Space”: Activist Landscape Architects of the 1960s. Landscape Journal, 33(2), 173–194.
  • Holl, S. (2009). Urbanisms: Working with Doubt. Princeton Architectural Press.
  • Maki, F. (2017). Open Space: Utopia is not a Building. The Architectural Review, 3(1), 1-11.
  • Nelson, W. A. (2013). Design, Research and Design Research: Synergies and Contradictions. Educational Technology, 53(1), 3–11.
  • Popper, K. (1947). The Open Society and its Enemies. George Routledge & Sons.
  • Specter, D. K. (1963). Open Space Design. Landscape Architecture, 53(2), 88.
  • Tschumi, B. (1996). Architecture and Disjunction. The MIT Press.
  • Uludağ, Z. & Güleç, G. (2018). Reinterpreting as a Critical Ground in Atelier 1 Projects: Some Prospects and Projections on Ankara. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 37(3), 413-425. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12144.
  • Urban, F. (2019). Review of Open Architecture: Migration, Citizenship and the Urban Renewal of Berlin-Kreuzberg by IBA 1984/87 by Esra Akcan. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 78(3), 358–359. https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2019.78.3.358
  • Van Rooyen, X. (2022). Free Plan versus Free Rooms: Two Conceptions of Open Architecture. Open Architecture: Tradition, Possibilities and Shortcomings. Footprint: Delft Architecture Theory Journal, 16(2), 85-103.
  • Vardouli, T., & Buechley, L. (2014). Open Source Architecture: An Exploration of Source Code and Access in Architectural Design. Leonardo, 47(1), 51–55.
  • Wigley, M. (2012). The Open-Sourced Architect. In D. Chipperfield, K. Long & S. Bose (Eds.), Common Ground: A Critical Reader (pp. 297-303). Venice Marsilio Books.
  • Wong, J. L. (2007). Culture, Heritage and Access to Open Spaces. In C. Ward Thompson, P. Travlou (Eds.), Open Space: People Space (pp. 41-54). Taylor & Francis.

Discussing open architecture in design studio: The case of Atelier 1 and Ankara

Year 2024, , 173 - 183, 15.08.2024

Gülşah Güleç , Zeynep Uludağ

https://doi.org/10.51664/artium.1348084

Abstract

Openness is an important quality of architecture that facilitates its adaptation to the changing spatial, social, cultural and environmental parameters of the world in the 21st century. The recent pandemic of COVID-19 has brought about the return of open space to the architectural agenda, given the need for openness and social distance. Aside from the pandemic, the current economic crises, ecological concerns and technological advances also lead us to consider open architecture as a means by which we can understand the new dynamics and realities of this century. Thus, we announced Open Architecture as the theme of the years of 2021–2022 in the design studio of Atelier 1 at Gazi University Faculty of Architecture Department of Architecture in Ankara. We discuss openness as a site-specific quality that allows architecture to establish new relationships with the site and society. Hence, the students of the studio design their open architectural projects to be responsive to the physical and social potentials and problems of the city of Ankara recently.

Keywords

architectural design studio architectural project open architecture open space open structure

References

  • Akcan, E. (2018). Open Architecture: Migration, Citizenship and The Urban Renewal of Berlin-Kreuzberg by IBA-1984/87. Birkhauser.
  • August, T., Shin, H., & Tunca, T. I. (2013). Licensing and Competition for Services in Open Source Software. Information Systems Research, 24(4), 1068–1086.
  • Behnisch, G. (1997). Günter Behnisch for an “Open” Architecture: A Discussion of Collaboration and the Design Process. Perspecta, (28), 65–77.
  • Behnisch, G. (2005). For an Open Architecture. (Re)Reading Perspecta: The First Fifty Years of the Yale Architectural Journal, 1(1), 688-691.
  • De Carlo, G. (2005). An Architecture of Participation. (Re)Reading Perspecta: The First Fifty Years of the Yale Architectural Journal, 1(1), 396-400.
  • Eco, U. (1989). The Open Work. Harvard University Press.
  • Fabbrini, S. (2022). Ventotene and Gorizia: Opening the Panopticon. Open Architecture: Tradition, Possibilities and Shortcomings. Footprint: Delft Architecture Theory Journal, 16(2), 21-40.
  • Gausa, M., Guallart, V., Müller, W., Soriano, F., Porras, F. & Morales, J. (2003). The Metapolis Dictionary of Advanced Architecture: City, Technology and Society in the Information Age. Actar Publishing.
  • Gehl, J. (2007). Public Spaces for a Changing Public Life. In C. Ward Thompson, P. Travlou (Eds.), Open space: People space (pp. 3-10). Taylor & Francis.
  • Gregory, A., Livesey, G., & Weddle, R. (2013). Introduction: Boundaries in Architectural Education. Journal of Architectural Education (1984-), 67(2), 171–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.2013.817168
  • Hansen, O., Hansen, Z. (1961). The Open Form in Architecture [CIAM ’59]. Verlag.
  • Hernández, J. M., Kömez Dağlıoğlu, E. (2022). Open Architecture and its Discontents. Open Architecture: Tradition, Possibilities and Shortcomings. Footprint: Delft Architecture Theory Journal, 16(2), 3-8.
  • Hirsch, A. B. (2014). From “Open Space” to “Public Space”: Activist Landscape Architects of the 1960s. Landscape Journal, 33(2), 173–194.
  • Holl, S. (2009). Urbanisms: Working with Doubt. Princeton Architectural Press.
  • Maki, F. (2017). Open Space: Utopia is not a Building. The Architectural Review, 3(1), 1-11.
  • Nelson, W. A. (2013). Design, Research and Design Research: Synergies and Contradictions. Educational Technology, 53(1), 3–11.
  • Popper, K. (1947). The Open Society and its Enemies. George Routledge & Sons.
  • Specter, D. K. (1963). Open Space Design. Landscape Architecture, 53(2), 88.
  • Tschumi, B. (1996). Architecture and Disjunction. The MIT Press.
  • Uludağ, Z. & Güleç, G. (2018). Reinterpreting as a Critical Ground in Atelier 1 Projects: Some Prospects and Projections on Ankara. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 37(3), 413-425. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12144.
  • Urban, F. (2019). Review of Open Architecture: Migration, Citizenship and the Urban Renewal of Berlin-Kreuzberg by IBA 1984/87 by Esra Akcan. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 78(3), 358–359. https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2019.78.3.358
  • Van Rooyen, X. (2022). Free Plan versus Free Rooms: Two Conceptions of Open Architecture. Open Architecture: Tradition, Possibilities and Shortcomings. Footprint: Delft Architecture Theory Journal, 16(2), 85-103.
  • Vardouli, T., & Buechley, L. (2014). Open Source Architecture: An Exploration of Source Code and Access in Architectural Design. Leonardo, 47(1), 51–55.
  • Wigley, M. (2012). The Open-Sourced Architect. In D. Chipperfield, K. Long & S. Bose (Eds.), Common Ground: A Critical Reader (pp. 297-303). Venice Marsilio Books.
  • Wong, J. L. (2007). Culture, Heritage and Access to Open Spaces. In C. Ward Thompson, P. Travlou (Eds.), Open Space: People Space (pp. 41-54). Taylor & Francis.
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Architectural Design
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Gülşah Güleç 0000-0002-8041-2018

Zeynep Uludağ 0000-0001-9242-7957

Publication Date August 15, 2024
Acceptance Date April 22, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024

Cite

APA Güleç, G., & Uludağ, Z. (2024). Discussing open architecture in design studio: The case of Atelier 1 and Ankara. Artium, 12(2), 173-183. https://doi.org/10.51664/artium.1348084

Artium is an OAJ supported by Hasan Kalyoncu University

Open access articles in Artium are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). 

28842https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/