Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Bir Konut Projesi Örneğinde İnşa Edilebilirlik Değerlendirme Yöntemlerinin Araştırılması

Year 2020, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 135 - 150, 25.12.2020

İlkay Koman Suna Kaya

https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.785500
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Proje hedeflerine ulaşmak için planlama, mühendislik, şantiye alanında ve satın alma süreçlerinde inşaat bilgisi ve deneyiminin birlikte optimum kullanımına yönelik sistemleri, yöntemleri geliştirmeyi amaçlayan çalışmaların başında inşa edilebilirlik değerlendirme yöntemleri gelir. Bu çalışma inşa edilebilirlik değerlendirme yöntemlerinin ve iki farklı inşa edilebilirlik değerlendirme yönteminin detaylı olarak incelenmesini kapsamaktadır. Örnek bir konut projesinin inşa edilebilirlik sistemlerinden aldığı puanlar yorumlanmış, elde edilen bulgular karşılaştırılmıştır. Mevcut sistemler büyük ölçekli projelerin değerlendirilmesi için kullanılmak üzere geliştirilmiş, inşaatta verimliliğe odaklanan sistemlerdir. Çalışmada özellikle kentsel dönüşüm projelerinde gerçekleştirilmekte olan projelerin inşa edilebilirlik değerlendirmesinin yapılmasının önemi ortaya koyulmuştur. Çalışma, ülkemiz için geliştirilecek inşa edilebilirlik değerlendirme yöntemlerine zemin hazırlaması açısından önemlidir.

Keywords

inşa edilebilirlik inşa edilebilir tasarım yapı değerlendirme yöntemleri

Thanks

Makalede, ulusal ve uluslararası araştırma ve yayın etiğine uyulmuştur. Çalışmada Etik Kurul izni gerekmemiştir.

References

  • Adams, S. (1989). Practical buildability, Construction Industry Research Information Association (CIRIA), Butterworths, London.
  • Arditi, D., Elhassan, A. ve Toklu, Y.C. (2002). Constructability Analysis İn The Design Firm, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(2), 117-26. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:2(117).
  • Barai, S. V. ve Nair, R. S. (2004). Neuro-fuzzy models for constructability analysis, ITcon, 9, 65-73. Erişim Adresi (24.08.2020): https://www.itcon.org/2004/4.
  • BCA. (2000). Code of Practice on Buildable Design. Building and Construction Authority, Singapore. ISBN 9971-88-745-2.
  • BCA. (2005). Code of Practice on Buildable Design, Building and Construction Authority, Singapore. Erişim Adresi (24.08.2020): https://docplayer.net/20798161-Code-of-practice-on-buildable-design-september-2005.html.
  • BCA. (2011). Code of Practice on Buildability 2011 Edition. Building and Construction Authority, Singapore. Erişim Adresi (24.08.2020): https://www1.bca.gov.sg/docs/default-source/docs-corp-news-and-publications/publications/for-industry/buildability-series/copbdapr2011.pdf
  • BCA. (2017). Code of Practice on Buildability 2017 Edition. Building and Construction Authority, Singapore. Erişim Adresi (24.08.2020): https://www1.bca.gov.sg/docs/default-source/docs-corp-news-and-publications/publications/for-industry/buildability-series/cop2017.pdf
  • CII Construction Industry Institute. (1986). Constructability: A Primer. Construction Industry Institute, University of Texas, Austin.
  • CIRIA Construction Industry Research and Information Association. (1979). CIRIA 79: Report for the Year Ending 31st December 1978. CIRIA, London.
  • CIRIA Construction Industry Research and Information Association. (1983). Buildability: An Assessment. CIRIA, London. ISBN: 0860172023 9780860172024.
  • Ferguson, I. (1989). Buildability in Practice, Mitchell Publishing Company Limited, London.
  • Francis, V. E., Chen, S. E., Mehrtens, V. M., Sidwell, A. C., ve Mc George, W. D. (1999). Constructability Strategy for Improved Project Performance. Architectural Science Review, 42(2), 133-138. doi: 10.1080/00038628.1999.9696866.
  • Griffith, A. (1987). An Investigation into Factors Influencing Buildability and Levels of Productivity for Application to Selecting Alternative Design Solutions – A Preliminary Report, 646–657. Managing Construction Worldwide, Chartered Institute of Building. CIOB 2.
  • İlter, D. (2010). İnşaat Projelerinde Uyuşmazlık Çözüm Yöntemi Seçimi İçin Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Modeli. (Doktora Tezi). İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Kamari, A. A. ve Pimplikar, S. S. (2012). Architectural Designs and Constructability Issues. AKGEC International Journal of Technology, 3(1), 8-17. Erişim Adresi (24.08.2020): https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/34614822/architectural-designs-and-constructability-issues. Kerridge, A. E. (1993). Plan for constructability, Hydrocarbon Processing, 72(1), 35.
  • Keskenler, M. ve Keskenler, E. (2017). Bulanık Mantığın Tarihi Gelişimi. Takvim-i Vekayi, 5 (1), 1-10. Erişim Adresi (24.08.2020): https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/takvim/issue/33455/371973.
  • Lam, P. T. I., Wong, F. W. H. ve Chan, A. P. C. (2006). Contributions of Designersto İmproving Buildability and Constructability. Design Studies, 27(4), 457-479. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2005.10.003.
  • Lam, P. T. I., Wong, F. W., Chan, A. P. ve Chan, D. W. (2008). Benchmarking Buildability Using the Buildability Assessment Model in Hong Kong. HKIE transactions, 15(1), 7-17. doi: 10.1080/1023697X.2008.10668104.
  • Lam, P. T. ve Wong, F. W. (2008). Implementing A Buildability Assessment Model For Buildability Improvement. Architectural Science Review, 51(2), 173-184. doi: 10.3763/asre.2008.5121.
  • Lam, P. T. I. ve Wong F. W. H. (2009). Improving Building Project Performance: How Buildability Benchmarking Can Help. Construction Management and Economics, 27(1), 41-52. doi: 10.1080/01446190802570498.
  • Low, S. P. ve Abeyegoonasekera, B. (2001). Integrating Buildability in ISO 9000 Quality Management Systems: Case Study of a Condominium Project. Building and Environment, 36(3), 299-312. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1323(00)00004-4.
  • McGeorge, D., Chen S. E. ve Ostwald M. J. (1992). The Development of a Conceptual Model of Buildability which Identifies User Satisfaction as a Major Objective, CIB Conference, Rotterdam.
  • Pepper, H. C. (1994). The benefits of constructability reviews during the design of environmental capital projects, Cost Engineering, 36(2), 19-21.
  • Qing, Y. (2004). Modeling A Decision Support System For Buildable Designs (Doktora Tezi). Singapur Üniversitesi, Singapur.
  • Touran, A. (1988). Concrete Formwork: Constructability and Difficulties. Civil Engineering Practice, 3(2), 81-88. URA. (2019). Handbook on Gross Floor Area. Erişim Adresi (24.08.2020): https://www.ura.gov.sg/Corporate/Guidelines/Development-Control/gross-floor-area.
  • Wong, F. W. H., Darshi De Saram, D., Lam, P. T. I. ve Chan, D. W. M. (2006). A Compendium of Buildability Issues from the Viewpoints of Construction Practitioners. Architectural Science Review, 49, s.81-90. doi:10.3763/asre.2006.4910.
  • Wong, F. W. H., Lam, P. T. I. ve Shen, L. Y. (2004). A Dynamic Design Management System for Improving Buildability of Construction. 20th Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM) Conference. Heriot Watt University. Erişim Adresi (24.08.2020): http://www.arcom.ac.uk/-docs/proceedings/ar2004-0185-0194_Wong_Lam_and_Shen.pdf
  • Wong, W. H. (2007). Developing and Implementing an Empirical System for Scoring Buildability of Designs in the Hong Kong Construction Industry (Doktora Tezi). The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Department of Building and Real Estate, Hong Kong.
  • Zolfagharian, S., Nourbakhsh, M., Mydin, S. H., Zin, R. M. ve Irizarry, J. (2012). A Conceptual Method of Constructability Improvement. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4(4), 456-459. Erişim Adresi (24.08.2020): http://www.ijetch.org/papers/409-P043.pdf.

Research of Constructability Assessment Methods; Housing Case Study

Year 2020, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 135 - 150, 25.12.2020

İlkay Koman Suna Kaya

https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.785500
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Constructability assessment methods are at the head of the works aiming to develop systems and methods for the optimum use of construction knowledge and experience in planning, engineering, construction site and procurement processes in order to achieve the project objectives. This study includes a detailed examination of constructability assessment methods. The scores of a sample housing project from constructability systems were interpreted and the findings obtained were compared. Existing systems are developed to be used for the evaluation of large-scale projects, focusing on efficiency in construction. In the study, the importance of the constructability assessment of the projects in this scope, which are carried out especially in reconstruction projects to be carried out in urban areas, has been revealed. The study is important in terms of laying the groundwork for constructability assessment methods to be developed for our country.

Keywords

Constructability buildability building assessment methods

References

  • Adams, S. (1989). Practical buildability, Construction Industry Research Information Association (CIRIA), Butterworths, London.
  • Arditi, D., Elhassan, A. ve Toklu, Y.C. (2002). Constructability Analysis İn The Design Firm, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(2), 117-26. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:2(117).
  • Barai, S. V. ve Nair, R. S. (2004). Neuro-fuzzy models for constructability analysis, ITcon, 9, 65-73. Erişim Adresi (24.08.2020): https://www.itcon.org/2004/4.
  • BCA. (2000). Code of Practice on Buildable Design. Building and Construction Authority, Singapore. ISBN 9971-88-745-2.
  • BCA. (2005). Code of Practice on Buildable Design, Building and Construction Authority, Singapore. Erişim Adresi (24.08.2020): https://docplayer.net/20798161-Code-of-practice-on-buildable-design-september-2005.html.
  • BCA. (2011). Code of Practice on Buildability 2011 Edition. Building and Construction Authority, Singapore. Erişim Adresi (24.08.2020): https://www1.bca.gov.sg/docs/default-source/docs-corp-news-and-publications/publications/for-industry/buildability-series/copbdapr2011.pdf
  • BCA. (2017). Code of Practice on Buildability 2017 Edition. Building and Construction Authority, Singapore. Erişim Adresi (24.08.2020): https://www1.bca.gov.sg/docs/default-source/docs-corp-news-and-publications/publications/for-industry/buildability-series/cop2017.pdf
  • CII Construction Industry Institute. (1986). Constructability: A Primer. Construction Industry Institute, University of Texas, Austin.
  • CIRIA Construction Industry Research and Information Association. (1979). CIRIA 79: Report for the Year Ending 31st December 1978. CIRIA, London.
  • CIRIA Construction Industry Research and Information Association. (1983). Buildability: An Assessment. CIRIA, London. ISBN: 0860172023 9780860172024.
  • Ferguson, I. (1989). Buildability in Practice, Mitchell Publishing Company Limited, London.
  • Francis, V. E., Chen, S. E., Mehrtens, V. M., Sidwell, A. C., ve Mc George, W. D. (1999). Constructability Strategy for Improved Project Performance. Architectural Science Review, 42(2), 133-138. doi: 10.1080/00038628.1999.9696866.
  • Griffith, A. (1987). An Investigation into Factors Influencing Buildability and Levels of Productivity for Application to Selecting Alternative Design Solutions – A Preliminary Report, 646–657. Managing Construction Worldwide, Chartered Institute of Building. CIOB 2.
  • İlter, D. (2010). İnşaat Projelerinde Uyuşmazlık Çözüm Yöntemi Seçimi İçin Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Modeli. (Doktora Tezi). İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Kamari, A. A. ve Pimplikar, S. S. (2012). Architectural Designs and Constructability Issues. AKGEC International Journal of Technology, 3(1), 8-17. Erişim Adresi (24.08.2020): https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/34614822/architectural-designs-and-constructability-issues. Kerridge, A. E. (1993). Plan for constructability, Hydrocarbon Processing, 72(1), 35.
  • Keskenler, M. ve Keskenler, E. (2017). Bulanık Mantığın Tarihi Gelişimi. Takvim-i Vekayi, 5 (1), 1-10. Erişim Adresi (24.08.2020): https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/takvim/issue/33455/371973.
  • Lam, P. T. I., Wong, F. W. H. ve Chan, A. P. C. (2006). Contributions of Designersto İmproving Buildability and Constructability. Design Studies, 27(4), 457-479. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2005.10.003.
  • Lam, P. T. I., Wong, F. W., Chan, A. P. ve Chan, D. W. (2008). Benchmarking Buildability Using the Buildability Assessment Model in Hong Kong. HKIE transactions, 15(1), 7-17. doi: 10.1080/1023697X.2008.10668104.
  • Lam, P. T. ve Wong, F. W. (2008). Implementing A Buildability Assessment Model For Buildability Improvement. Architectural Science Review, 51(2), 173-184. doi: 10.3763/asre.2008.5121.
  • Lam, P. T. I. ve Wong F. W. H. (2009). Improving Building Project Performance: How Buildability Benchmarking Can Help. Construction Management and Economics, 27(1), 41-52. doi: 10.1080/01446190802570498.
  • Low, S. P. ve Abeyegoonasekera, B. (2001). Integrating Buildability in ISO 9000 Quality Management Systems: Case Study of a Condominium Project. Building and Environment, 36(3), 299-312. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1323(00)00004-4.
  • McGeorge, D., Chen S. E. ve Ostwald M. J. (1992). The Development of a Conceptual Model of Buildability which Identifies User Satisfaction as a Major Objective, CIB Conference, Rotterdam.
  • Pepper, H. C. (1994). The benefits of constructability reviews during the design of environmental capital projects, Cost Engineering, 36(2), 19-21.
  • Qing, Y. (2004). Modeling A Decision Support System For Buildable Designs (Doktora Tezi). Singapur Üniversitesi, Singapur.
  • Touran, A. (1988). Concrete Formwork: Constructability and Difficulties. Civil Engineering Practice, 3(2), 81-88. URA. (2019). Handbook on Gross Floor Area. Erişim Adresi (24.08.2020): https://www.ura.gov.sg/Corporate/Guidelines/Development-Control/gross-floor-area.
  • Wong, F. W. H., Darshi De Saram, D., Lam, P. T. I. ve Chan, D. W. M. (2006). A Compendium of Buildability Issues from the Viewpoints of Construction Practitioners. Architectural Science Review, 49, s.81-90. doi:10.3763/asre.2006.4910.
  • Wong, F. W. H., Lam, P. T. I. ve Shen, L. Y. (2004). A Dynamic Design Management System for Improving Buildability of Construction. 20th Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM) Conference. Heriot Watt University. Erişim Adresi (24.08.2020): http://www.arcom.ac.uk/-docs/proceedings/ar2004-0185-0194_Wong_Lam_and_Shen.pdf
  • Wong, W. H. (2007). Developing and Implementing an Empirical System for Scoring Buildability of Designs in the Hong Kong Construction Industry (Doktora Tezi). The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Department of Building and Real Estate, Hong Kong.
  • Zolfagharian, S., Nourbakhsh, M., Mydin, S. H., Zin, R. M. ve Irizarry, J. (2012). A Conceptual Method of Constructability Improvement. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4(4), 456-459. Erişim Adresi (24.08.2020): http://www.ijetch.org/papers/409-P043.pdf.
There are 29 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Architecture
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

İlkay Koman 0000-0002-2195-3594

Suna Kaya 0000-0001-8302-0063

Publication Date December 25, 2020
Submission Date August 26, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 5 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Koman, İ., & Kaya, S. (2020). Bir Konut Projesi Örneğinde İnşa Edilebilirlik Değerlendirme Yöntemlerinin Araştırılması. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 5(2), 135-150. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.785500

Cited By

6 Şubat 2023’te Yaşanan Depremlerde Rezidansların Gösterdikleri Sismik Performansın Mimari Etik Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi ve Çözüm Önerileri: Hatay Örneği
Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi (MBUD)
https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1328556
 Download Cover Image

 26583JASA JOURNAL TAG / MBUD DERGİ KÜNYESİ



Flag Counter