Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The Importance of Mapping Natural and Cultural Routes in Rural Tourism: Bartın Case

Year 2017, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 32 - 38, 01.06.2017

Abstract

In this study it is aimed to develop a route planning which will evaluate the diversity of natural assets and original cultural accumulation in the province of Bartın where nature based tourism has not yet matured. During the process of determining the natural and cultural corridors in Bartın, primarily the identification and evaluation of regional and local identities has been emphasized. Within this scope; it was tried to establish a cooperative model in which the relevant public institutions, local governments and non-governmental organizations co-exist. Priority studies in which data on the determination of values are obtained includes detailed field studies, face-to-face interviews, focus group meetings and printed publications. Bartın Province which is specialized in regional identity of Western Black Sea Region with local identity and original values has been effective in the creation of spatial design of routes. In addition, route spatial design is done via partnership, conservation and revivals, thematic approach, rural development, alternative tourism, local participation, holistic promotion and local activities. Thematic values and geographical thresholds are taken into account by a holistic route approach while networking features has been proposed. With the "network route" design approach, 6 main routes (Parthenios, Amastris, Kromna, Bartın Küre, Ulus Küre and Karaca) and alternative routes (32 sub routes) connected to these routes, route focal points and external links are determined. It is expected that the routes will make significant contributions to the objectives of protecting the cultural values and the rural development of many destinations that are mentioned as priority targets for the future of Bartın.

References

  • Budowski, G., 1976. Tourism and Environmental Conservation: Conflict, Coexistence or Symbiosis. Environmental Conservation 3: 27–31.
  • Higginbottom K.,Tribe A., Booth R., 2003. Contributions of Non-consumptive Wildlife Tourism to Conservation Nature-based Tourism, Environment and Land Management. Edited by R. Buckley, C. Pickering and D.B. Weaver. CABI Publishing, UK.
  • Durusoy, E. 2013. From An Ancient Road to A Cultural Route: Conservatıon And Management Of The Road Between Milas And Labraunda /Tarihi Yoldan Kültürel Rotaya: Milas ve Labraunda Arasındaki Yolun Korunması Ve Yönetimi ODTÜ, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Mimarlık Bölümü, Restorasyon Anabilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • Karataş, E., 2011. “The Role of Cultural Route Planning in Cultural Heritage Conservation: The Case of Central Lycia.” ODTÜ, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Mimarlık Bölümü, Restorasyon Anabilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • EICR, 2017. Mission. European Institute of Cultural Routes.http://culture-routes.net/the-institute/mission. Accessed on 22.06.2017.
  • CRS, 2017. Culture Routes in Turkey-Long Distance Hiking Trails for All. Culture Route Society can be reached from http://cultureroutesinturkey.com. Accessed on 01.04.2013
  • UNESCO, 2017. Further information about the “World Heritage Convention for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage of UNESCO” can be obtained from: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/convention-en.pdf. Accessed on 21.06. 2017.
  • AICOMOS, 2017. 2001 Making Tracks Making Tracks. From Point to Pathway: the Heritage of Routes&Journeys. http://www.aicomos.com/2001-makingtracks/, Accessed on 22.06.2017.
  • Görmüş, S., Atmiş, E., Özkazanç, N.K., Günşen, H.B., Artar, M. 2016. Ekorota Bartın: Doğal ve Kültürel Koridorların Haritalanması. Bartın Üniversitesi Yayınları No: 26, Orman Fakültesi Yayınları No: 11. Stil Matbaacılık, İstanbul.
  • TÜİK, 2015. Republic of Turkey Turkish Statistical Institute Address Based Population Registration System Results. http://tuikapp.tuik.gov.tr/adnksdagitapp/adnks Accessed on 11.11.2015.
  • GDF, 2015. Republic of Turkey General Directorate of Forestry, Official Forestry Statistic 2014, Ankara, TURKEY.
  • TÜİK, 2013. Population and Housing Census 2011. Republic of Turkey Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara, TURKEY, p. 304.
  • ÇEKÜL, 2015. Kültür Rotaları Planlama Rehberi. Tarihi Kentler Birliği Kılavuz Kitapçıklar Dizisi 3. İstanbul.
  • UNWTO, 2015. World Tourism Organization Global Report on Cultural Routes and Itineraries, Affiliate Members Report: vol.12, s. 38.
  • Turoğlu, H. and Özdemir, H., 2005. Determination of Ecotourism Potential in Bartın City. Eastern Geographical Review, 10(13): 97-116.
Year 2017, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 32 - 38, 01.06.2017

Abstract

References

  • Budowski, G., 1976. Tourism and Environmental Conservation: Conflict, Coexistence or Symbiosis. Environmental Conservation 3: 27–31.
  • Higginbottom K.,Tribe A., Booth R., 2003. Contributions of Non-consumptive Wildlife Tourism to Conservation Nature-based Tourism, Environment and Land Management. Edited by R. Buckley, C. Pickering and D.B. Weaver. CABI Publishing, UK.
  • Durusoy, E. 2013. From An Ancient Road to A Cultural Route: Conservatıon And Management Of The Road Between Milas And Labraunda /Tarihi Yoldan Kültürel Rotaya: Milas ve Labraunda Arasındaki Yolun Korunması Ve Yönetimi ODTÜ, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Mimarlık Bölümü, Restorasyon Anabilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • Karataş, E., 2011. “The Role of Cultural Route Planning in Cultural Heritage Conservation: The Case of Central Lycia.” ODTÜ, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Mimarlık Bölümü, Restorasyon Anabilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • EICR, 2017. Mission. European Institute of Cultural Routes.http://culture-routes.net/the-institute/mission. Accessed on 22.06.2017.
  • CRS, 2017. Culture Routes in Turkey-Long Distance Hiking Trails for All. Culture Route Society can be reached from http://cultureroutesinturkey.com. Accessed on 01.04.2013
  • UNESCO, 2017. Further information about the “World Heritage Convention for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage of UNESCO” can be obtained from: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/convention-en.pdf. Accessed on 21.06. 2017.
  • AICOMOS, 2017. 2001 Making Tracks Making Tracks. From Point to Pathway: the Heritage of Routes&Journeys. http://www.aicomos.com/2001-makingtracks/, Accessed on 22.06.2017.
  • Görmüş, S., Atmiş, E., Özkazanç, N.K., Günşen, H.B., Artar, M. 2016. Ekorota Bartın: Doğal ve Kültürel Koridorların Haritalanması. Bartın Üniversitesi Yayınları No: 26, Orman Fakültesi Yayınları No: 11. Stil Matbaacılık, İstanbul.
  • TÜİK, 2015. Republic of Turkey Turkish Statistical Institute Address Based Population Registration System Results. http://tuikapp.tuik.gov.tr/adnksdagitapp/adnks Accessed on 11.11.2015.
  • GDF, 2015. Republic of Turkey General Directorate of Forestry, Official Forestry Statistic 2014, Ankara, TURKEY.
  • TÜİK, 2013. Population and Housing Census 2011. Republic of Turkey Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara, TURKEY, p. 304.
  • ÇEKÜL, 2015. Kültür Rotaları Planlama Rehberi. Tarihi Kentler Birliği Kılavuz Kitapçıklar Dizisi 3. İstanbul.
  • UNWTO, 2015. World Tourism Organization Global Report on Cultural Routes and Itineraries, Affiliate Members Report: vol.12, s. 38.
  • Turoğlu, H. and Özdemir, H., 2005. Determination of Ecotourism Potential in Bartın City. Eastern Geographical Review, 10(13): 97-116.
There are 15 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Agricultural Engineering
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Sevgi Görmüş

Erdoğan Atmış This is me

Hikmet Batuhan Günşen This is me

Nuri Kaan Özkazanç This is me

Mustafa Artar This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 10 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Görmüş, S., Atmış, E., Günşen, H. B., Özkazanç, N. K., et al. (2017). The Importance of Mapping Natural and Cultural Routes in Rural Tourism: Bartın Case. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 10(1), 32-38.
AMA Görmüş S, Atmış E, Günşen HB, Özkazanç NK, Artar M. The Importance of Mapping Natural and Cultural Routes in Rural Tourism: Bartın Case. Tarım Bilim. Araşt. Derg. (online). June 2017;10(1):32-38.
Chicago Görmüş, Sevgi, Erdoğan Atmış, Hikmet Batuhan Günşen, Nuri Kaan Özkazanç, and Mustafa Artar. “The Importance of Mapping Natural and Cultural Routes in Rural Tourism: Bartın Case”. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi 10, no. 1 (June 2017): 32-38.
EndNote Görmüş S, Atmış E, Günşen HB, Özkazanç NK, Artar M (June 1, 2017) The Importance of Mapping Natural and Cultural Routes in Rural Tourism: Bartın Case. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi 10 1 32–38.
IEEE S. Görmüş, E. Atmış, H. B. Günşen, N. K. Özkazanç, and M. Artar, “The Importance of Mapping Natural and Cultural Routes in Rural Tourism: Bartın Case”, Tarım Bilim. Araşt. Derg. (online), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 32–38, 2017.
ISNAD Görmüş, Sevgi et al. “The Importance of Mapping Natural and Cultural Routes in Rural Tourism: Bartın Case”. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi 10/1 (June 2017), 32-38.
JAMA Görmüş S, Atmış E, Günşen HB, Özkazanç NK, Artar M. The Importance of Mapping Natural and Cultural Routes in Rural Tourism: Bartın Case. Tarım Bilim. Araşt. Derg. (online). 2017;10:32–38.
MLA Görmüş, Sevgi et al. “The Importance of Mapping Natural and Cultural Routes in Rural Tourism: Bartın Case”. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, vol. 10, no. 1, 2017, pp. 32-38.
Vancouver Görmüş S, Atmış E, Günşen HB, Özkazanç NK, Artar M. The Importance of Mapping Natural and Cultural Routes in Rural Tourism: Bartın Case. Tarım Bilim. Araşt. Derg. (online). 2017;10(1):32-8.