Öz
In this study I aim to examine the attributes ‘best’ and ‘most perfect’ that Leibniz frequently makes use of concerning the question of free will. The question of free will constitutes a crucial theme throughout Leibniz’s philosophy and particularly in regard to his concern with morality. In accordance with the essential constituents of his philosophy such as the best possible world and the necessity-contingency dichotomy, I aim at debating the legitimacy of Leibniz’s use of these attributes with respect to divine and human acts as free actsthe divine in a supreme manner and the human in degrees. In this context, Leibniz’s writings that cover the question of free will and two of his renowned texts, Monodology and Discourse on Metaphysics will be consulted.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Adams, R. M. (1994). Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Bayam E. G. (2021). Leibniz’de İlahi Nedensellik, FLSF Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (31), 653-74.
- Bennett, J. (2005). Leibniz’s Two Realms, D. Rutherford & J. A. Cover (Ed.), in Leibniz: Nature and Freedom (135-154), New York: Oxford University Press.
- Blumenfeld, David. (2006). Perfection and Happiness in the Best Possible World, N. Jolles (Ed.), in The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz (382-410), Cambridge University Press.
- Leibniz, G. W. (2014) Leibniz’s Monadology: A new Translation and Guide, L. Strickland (Trans.), Edinburgh University Press.
- Leibniz, G. W. (2020). Leibniz: Discourse on Metaphysics, G. Rodriguez-Pereyra (Trans.), Oxford University Press.
- McDonough, J. (2018). Freedom and Contingency, M. R. Antognazza (Ed.), in The Oxford Handbook of Leibniz (86-100), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Öz
In this study I aim to examine the attributes ‘best’ and ‘most perfect’ that Leibniz frequently makes use of concerning the question of free will. The question of free will constitutes a crucial theme throughout Leibniz’s philosophy and particularly in regard to his concern with morality. In accordance with the essential constituents of his philosophy such as the best possible world and the necessity-contingency dichotomy, I aim at debating the legitimacy of Leibniz’s use of these attributes with respect to divine and human acts as free actsthe divine in a supreme manner and the human in degrees. In this context, Leibniz’s writings that cover the question of free will and two of his renowned texts, Monodology and Discourse on Metaphysics will be consulted.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Adams, R. M. (1994). Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Bayam E. G. (2021). Leibniz’de İlahi Nedensellik, FLSF Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (31), 653-74.
- Bennett, J. (2005). Leibniz’s Two Realms, D. Rutherford & J. A. Cover (Ed.), in Leibniz: Nature and Freedom (135-154), New York: Oxford University Press.
- Blumenfeld, David. (2006). Perfection and Happiness in the Best Possible World, N. Jolles (Ed.), in The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz (382-410), Cambridge University Press.
- Leibniz, G. W. (2014) Leibniz’s Monadology: A new Translation and Guide, L. Strickland (Trans.), Edinburgh University Press.
- Leibniz, G. W. (2020). Leibniz: Discourse on Metaphysics, G. Rodriguez-Pereyra (Trans.), Oxford University Press.
- McDonough, J. (2018). Freedom and Contingency, M. R. Antognazza (Ed.), in The Oxford Handbook of Leibniz (86-100), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Din Sosyolojisi |
| Bölüm | Makaleler |
| Yazarlar | |
| Erken Görünüm Tarihi | 29 Aralık 2023 |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 31 Aralık 2023 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 2 Aralık 2023 |
| Kabul Tarihi | 22 Aralık 2023 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2023 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 13 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.