Öz
In the 20th century, the relationship between
globalization and architectural design had been broken down and all regional
borders was eliminated. In this context,
architecture has ceased to be a regional phenomenon and has become a universal
phenomenon with no boundaries anymore. The study advocates that critical
regionalism can be a solution as a way of embodied the spirit of the place,
establishing the 'architectural
design-place' relationship correctly. In the ‘Critical Regionalism’ approach, it is aimed to design contemporary
place-oriented with the values of 'place'.
In the scope of study, the ten
points voiced by Kenneth Frampton in 1987 is interpreted and nine criteria are
designated, however after conceiving these criteria are inadequate in present
conditions, four more criteria are added and the thirteen universal criteria of
being able to qualify “a structure as
critical regional - a belonging to that place (region)” have been
demonstrated in four groups. The main aim of this study is to determine, which
criteria are eligible to name a structure as critical regional (a belonging to
that place) and the priority ranking of these criteria. Within this context, 34
Dr. titled experts who are from Restoration Department, Architecture History
Department and Building Knowledge Department of Selcuk University, Gazi
University and Middle East Technical University were asked to score how much
the determined criteria are influential in perceiving a design’s belonging to
that place. Results were analyzed with AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process)
method and the priority criteria have been identified in determining “a structure as a belonging to that place
(region) – as critical regional”, after designating the validity of the
principles set forth in the scope of the study and the priority of all these
criteria.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Architectural design Place-specific design Critical regionalism Kenneth Frampton AHP
Kaynakça
- [1] Norberg-Schulz, C. 1980. Genius loci: towards a phenomenology of architecture. Rizzoli, New York.
- [2] Abel, C. 1997. Architecture and Identity: Responses to Cultural and Technological Change. Architectural Press, Oxford, United Kingdom
- [3] Corbusier, L. 1952. Towards A New Architecture. The Architectural Press, London, 7-126.
- [4] Orhon, T., Yırtıcı, H. 1995. Postmodernizm, Gelenek ve Olumlamanın Kolaycılığı. Arredamento architecture (70), 132-134.
- [5] McLeod, M. 1989. Architecture and politics in the Reagan era: From postmodernism to deconstructivism. Assemblage (8), 23-59.
- [6] Venturi, R. 1977. Complexity and contradiction in architecture. The museum of modern art, New York.
- [7] Harvey, D. 1997. Postmodernliğin Durumu. Translated by Sungur Savran, Metis publications.
- [8] Allen, B. L. 2007. On Performative Regionalism. in Canizaro, Vincent B. (eds.), Architectural regionalism: collected writings on place, identity, modernity, and tradition, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 421-426.
- [9] Canizaro, V. B. 2007. Introduction. in Canizaro, V. B. (eds.), Architectural Regionalism: Collected Writings on Place, Identity, Modernity, and Tradition, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 17-33.
- [10] Tzonis, A., Lefaivre, L. 1985. The Grid and the Pathway: An Introduction to the Work of Dimitris and Suzana Antonakakis in the Context of Greek Architectural Culture. in Frampton, K. (eds.), Atelier 66: The Architecture of Dimitris and Suzana Antonakakis.
- [11] Tzonis, A., Lefaivre, L. 1996. Why Critical Regionalism Today?. in Nesbitt, K. (eds.), Theorizing a New Agenda for Architecture: An Anthology of Architectural Theory 1965-1995, Princeton Architectural Press.
- [12] Frampton, K. 1983. Towards a Critical Regionalism: Six Points for an Architecture of Resistance. in Foster, H. (eds.), The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture, Bay Press, Post Townsend, Washington, 16-30.
- [13] Frampton, K. 1983 Prospects for a Critical Regionalism. Perspecta, 20, 147-162.
- [14] Frampton, K. 1992. Critical regionalism: Modern architecture and cultural identity. in Frampton K. (eds.), Modern architecture: A critical history, Thames & Hudson world of art, 314-327.
- [15] Saaty, T. L. 1994. Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. Vol. VI, Universitas Pittsburgh, USA.
- [16] Saaty, T. 2005. The analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes for the measurement of intangible criteria and for decision-making, Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys, 345-405.
- [17] Van Nes, A. 2008. The Heaven, the Earth and the Optic Array: Norberg-Schulz’s Place Phenomenology and its Degree of Operationability, Footprint.
Öz
20. |
Anahtar Kelimeler
Mimari tasarım Kenneth Frampton AHP Yere özgü tasarım Eleştirel rejyonalizm AHP
Kaynakça
- [1] Norberg-Schulz, C. 1980. Genius loci: towards a phenomenology of architecture. Rizzoli, New York.
- [2] Abel, C. 1997. Architecture and Identity: Responses to Cultural and Technological Change. Architectural Press, Oxford, United Kingdom
- [3] Corbusier, L. 1952. Towards A New Architecture. The Architectural Press, London, 7-126.
- [4] Orhon, T., Yırtıcı, H. 1995. Postmodernizm, Gelenek ve Olumlamanın Kolaycılığı. Arredamento architecture (70), 132-134.
- [5] McLeod, M. 1989. Architecture and politics in the Reagan era: From postmodernism to deconstructivism. Assemblage (8), 23-59.
- [6] Venturi, R. 1977. Complexity and contradiction in architecture. The museum of modern art, New York.
- [7] Harvey, D. 1997. Postmodernliğin Durumu. Translated by Sungur Savran, Metis publications.
- [8] Allen, B. L. 2007. On Performative Regionalism. in Canizaro, Vincent B. (eds.), Architectural regionalism: collected writings on place, identity, modernity, and tradition, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 421-426.
- [9] Canizaro, V. B. 2007. Introduction. in Canizaro, V. B. (eds.), Architectural Regionalism: Collected Writings on Place, Identity, Modernity, and Tradition, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 17-33.
- [10] Tzonis, A., Lefaivre, L. 1985. The Grid and the Pathway: An Introduction to the Work of Dimitris and Suzana Antonakakis in the Context of Greek Architectural Culture. in Frampton, K. (eds.), Atelier 66: The Architecture of Dimitris and Suzana Antonakakis.
- [11] Tzonis, A., Lefaivre, L. 1996. Why Critical Regionalism Today?. in Nesbitt, K. (eds.), Theorizing a New Agenda for Architecture: An Anthology of Architectural Theory 1965-1995, Princeton Architectural Press.
- [12] Frampton, K. 1983. Towards a Critical Regionalism: Six Points for an Architecture of Resistance. in Foster, H. (eds.), The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture, Bay Press, Post Townsend, Washington, 16-30.
- [13] Frampton, K. 1983 Prospects for a Critical Regionalism. Perspecta, 20, 147-162.
- [14] Frampton, K. 1992. Critical regionalism: Modern architecture and cultural identity. in Frampton K. (eds.), Modern architecture: A critical history, Thames & Hudson world of art, 314-327.
- [15] Saaty, T. L. 1994. Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. Vol. VI, Universitas Pittsburgh, USA.
- [16] Saaty, T. 2005. The analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes for the measurement of intangible criteria and for decision-making, Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys, 345-405.
- [17] Van Nes, A. 2008. The Heaven, the Earth and the Optic Array: Norberg-Schulz’s Place Phenomenology and its Degree of Operationability, Footprint.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | Türkçe |
|---|---|
| Konular | Mühendislik |
| Bölüm | Makaleler |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 1 Mart 2019 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2019 Cilt: 23 Sayı: Özel |
Kaynak Göster
e-ISSN: 1308-6529