Redirecting to http://dergipark.org.tr/_fragment?_hash=EYpOm6hCW_o0CTmOCu39Qziplooa70-zwcxKw5cRzq0&_path=id%3D29606%26_format%3Dhtml%26_locale%3Dtr%26_controller%3DApp%255CController%255CSite%255CArticleController%253A%253AesiArticleStats.
 
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

-

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 0 - , 10.09.2015

Mahmut Serhat Yenice

Öz

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of urban green spaces in the city of Aksaray, Turkey. The estimates are based on quantitative data obtained from Aksaray 1/1.000 scale development plans along with reports and field surveys. At the end of the study, it was determined that children playground, neighborhood-quarter parks, sports facilities and city parks which form the uses of Aksaray city urban green space fall below spatial standards in terms of size, per capita space, and show inequality distribution in all Aksaray city. By using findings, some suggestions relating to urban open-green space systems for the future are defined in terms of e sustainable urban development. “”

Anahtar Kelimeler

GIS; Green systems; Spatial analyses; Sustainability

Kaynakça

  • Aksoy Y (2001). İstanbul kenti yeşil alan durumunun irdelenmesi. Phd Thesis, İstanbul Technical University (Unpublished), Turkey.
  • Altunkasa M F (2004). Adana'nın kentsel gelişim süreci ve yeşil alanlar. Adana Kent Konseyi Çevre Çalışma Grubu Bireysel Raporu. Adana.
  • Anonymous (2000). The Urban Audit: Towards the benchmarking of quality of life in European cities. Vol I. 13, 152-153. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
  • Beatley T (2000). Green urbanism: Learning from European cities. Island Press, Washington.
  • Burke J & Ewan J (1999). Sonoran preserve master plan: An open space plan for the phoenix sonoran desert. Arizona State University Press, Tempe.
  • Çetiner A (1991). Şehircilik çalişmalarinda donatim ilkeleri. İTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Baskı Atölyesi, İstanbul.
  • Chan E & Lee KLG (2008). Critical factors for improving social sustainability of urban renewal projects. Soc Indic Res 85:243–256.
  • Chiesura A (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning 68: 129-138.
  • Doygun H & İlter AA (2007). Kahramanmaraş kentinde mevcut ve öngörülen aktif yeşil alan yeterliliğinin incelenmesi. Ekoloji 65: 21-27.
  • Ersoy M (1994). Kentsel alan kullanım normları. Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Eşbah H (2006). Aydın'da kent parklarının bazı ekolojik kalite kriterleri yönünden irdelenmesi. Ekoloji 58: 42-48.
  • Frey H (1999). Designing the city: Towards a more sustainable urban form. E and FN Spon Press, New York.
  • Grahn P & Stigsdotter UA (2003). Landscape planning and stress. Urban Forest &Urban Green 2(2003): 001-018.
  • Gül A & Küçük V (2001). Kentsel açik-yeşil alanlar ve Isparta kenti örneğinde incelenmesi. SDU Faculty of Forestry Journal Seri A 2: 27-48.
  • Herzele V & Wiedeman T (2003). A monitoring tool for the provision for accessible and attractive green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning 63(2):109-126.
  • Neuvonen M, Sievanen T, Susan T & Terhi K (2007). Access to green areas and the frequency of visits: a case study in Helsinki. Urban Forestry &Urban Greening 6(4): 235-247.
  • Önder S, Polat AT & Korucu, S. (2011). The evaluation of existing and proposed active green spaces in Konya Selçuklu District, Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research 6(3): 738-747.
  • Özcan K (2006). Sürdürülebilir kentsel gelişmede açik-yeşil alanlarin rolü, Kırıkkale, Türkiye Örneği. Ekoloji 60:37-45.
  • Özkan S (1994). Aksaray ili arkeoloji araştirmalarina toplu bir bakiş. Tarih incelemeleri Dergisi IX: 159-172.
  • Thompson CW (2002). Urban open-space in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning 60:59-72.
  • Tümer H (1976). Rekreaktif alan ve tesisleri ölçütleri. Turizm ve Tanıtma Bakanlığı Planlama Dairesi Başkanlığı, Ankara.
  • Turner T (1998). Landscape Planning and Environmental Impact Design. UCL, London.
  • Westmacott R (1991). Scale economics: ecological theory and planning practice in urban landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 21: 21-29.
  • Yenice M S (2012). Kentsel yeşil alanlar için mekânsal yeterlilik ve erişebilirlik analizi; Burdur örneği, Türkiye. SDU Faculty of Forestry Journal 13:41-47.

A Method for Evaluation of the Efficiency of Urban Green Spaces; Aksaray, Turkey

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 0 - , 10.09.2015

Mahmut Serhat Yenice

Öz

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of urban green spaces in the city of Aksaray, Turkey. The estimates are based on quantitative data obtained from Aksaray 1/1.000 scale development plans along with reports and field surveys. At the end of the study, it was determined that children playground, neighborhood-quarter parks, sports facilities and city parks which form the uses of Aksaray city urban green space fall below spatial standards in terms of size, per capita space, and show inequality distribution in all Aksaray city. By using findings, some suggestions relating to urban open-green space systems for the future are defined in terms of e sustainable urban development.

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

  • Aksoy Y (2001). İstanbul kenti yeşil alan durumunun irdelenmesi. Phd Thesis, İstanbul Technical University (Unpublished), Turkey.
  • Altunkasa M F (2004). Adana'nın kentsel gelişim süreci ve yeşil alanlar. Adana Kent Konseyi Çevre Çalışma Grubu Bireysel Raporu. Adana.
  • Anonymous (2000). The Urban Audit: Towards the benchmarking of quality of life in European cities. Vol I. 13, 152-153. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
  • Beatley T (2000). Green urbanism: Learning from European cities. Island Press, Washington.
  • Burke J & Ewan J (1999). Sonoran preserve master plan: An open space plan for the phoenix sonoran desert. Arizona State University Press, Tempe.
  • Çetiner A (1991). Şehircilik çalişmalarinda donatim ilkeleri. İTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Baskı Atölyesi, İstanbul.
  • Chan E & Lee KLG (2008). Critical factors for improving social sustainability of urban renewal projects. Soc Indic Res 85:243–256.
  • Chiesura A (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning 68: 129-138.
  • Doygun H & İlter AA (2007). Kahramanmaraş kentinde mevcut ve öngörülen aktif yeşil alan yeterliliğinin incelenmesi. Ekoloji 65: 21-27.
  • Ersoy M (1994). Kentsel alan kullanım normları. Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Eşbah H (2006). Aydın'da kent parklarının bazı ekolojik kalite kriterleri yönünden irdelenmesi. Ekoloji 58: 42-48.
  • Frey H (1999). Designing the city: Towards a more sustainable urban form. E and FN Spon Press, New York.
  • Grahn P & Stigsdotter UA (2003). Landscape planning and stress. Urban Forest &Urban Green 2(2003): 001-018.
  • Gül A & Küçük V (2001). Kentsel açik-yeşil alanlar ve Isparta kenti örneğinde incelenmesi. SDU Faculty of Forestry Journal Seri A 2: 27-48.
  • Herzele V & Wiedeman T (2003). A monitoring tool for the provision for accessible and attractive green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning 63(2):109-126.
  • Neuvonen M, Sievanen T, Susan T & Terhi K (2007). Access to green areas and the frequency of visits: a case study in Helsinki. Urban Forestry &Urban Greening 6(4): 235-247.
  • Önder S, Polat AT & Korucu, S. (2011). The evaluation of existing and proposed active green spaces in Konya Selçuklu District, Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research 6(3): 738-747.
  • Özcan K (2006). Sürdürülebilir kentsel gelişmede açik-yeşil alanlarin rolü, Kırıkkale, Türkiye Örneği. Ekoloji 60:37-45.
  • Özkan S (1994). Aksaray ili arkeoloji araştirmalarina toplu bir bakiş. Tarih incelemeleri Dergisi IX: 159-172.
  • Thompson CW (2002). Urban open-space in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning 60:59-72.
  • Tümer H (1976). Rekreaktif alan ve tesisleri ölçütleri. Turizm ve Tanıtma Bakanlığı Planlama Dairesi Başkanlığı, Ankara.
  • Turner T (1998). Landscape Planning and Environmental Impact Design. UCL, London.
  • Westmacott R (1991). Scale economics: ecological theory and planning practice in urban landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 21: 21-29.
  • Yenice M S (2012). Kentsel yeşil alanlar için mekânsal yeterlilik ve erişebilirlik analizi; Burdur örneği, Türkiye. SDU Faculty of Forestry Journal 13:41-47.
Toplam 24 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Mahmut Serhat Yenice

Yayımlanma Tarihi 10 Eylül 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2015 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Yenice, M. S. (2015). A Method for Evaluation of the Efficiency of Urban Green Spaces; Aksaray, Turkey. Artium, 3(2).
 Kapak Resmi İndir

Artium is an OAJ supported by Hasan Kalyoncu University

Open access articles in Artium are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). 

28842https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/