Kent-içi Hareketlilik ve Sosyo-Mekânsal Değişim: 2000 Yılı İstanbul'una Bir Bakış

Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1 1 Haziran 2014
  • Ebru Kamacı
PDF İndir
EN TR

Intra-urban Mobility and Socio-spatial Transformation: Istanbul in 2000

Abstract

Between 1995 and 2000 one-tenth of the population of Istanbul, almost 1 million inhabitants, moved between districts in İstanbul. Who they are, how they interact with urban settings and finally during the transformation of the city how they are acting. This study primarily aims to answer the questions above through the comprehensive analysis of movers, immobile and migrants in the case of Istanbul. By doing this, this study also makes contributions to intra-urban mobility literature in Turkey. The data source is 2000 Turkish Population Census İstanbul meta-data sample and the analysis method is location quotient, of the study. The findings reveal that young, university graduated, employer and small-size households are the most mobile groups; on the other hand, old, primary school graduated, and unemployed and extendedfamily households are the least mobile groups. Furthermore, this findings highlights the increase effect of education during the intra-urban mobility process: the level of education increases the rate of mobility increase

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Aydemir, D., (1984). Intraurban residential mobility in Turkey (Effects of intraurban relocations on the efficiency of housing stock use). Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, ODTÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  2. Brown, L. & Moore, E. (1970). The intra-urban migration process: a perspective. Geografisca Annalar, Series B, Human Geography, 52, 1, 1-13.
  3. Cadwallader, M. (1992). Migration and Residential Mobility: Macro and Micro Approaches. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.
  4. Cadwalleder, M. (1982). Urban Residential Mobility: A Simultaneous Equations Approach. Transactions of the Insitute of British Geographers, New Series, 7, 4, 458-473.
  5. Clark, W. (2009). Changing Residential Preferences accross Income, Education and Age Findings from the Multi-city Study of Urban Inequality. Urban Affairs Review, 44, 3, 334-355.
  6. Clark, W. A. & Onaka, J. L. (1983). Life-cycle and Housing Adjustment as Explanations of Residential Mobility. Urban Studies, 20,47-57.
  7. Clark, W. & Huang, Y. (2004). Linking Migration and Mobility: Individual and Contextual Effects in British Housing Markets. Regional Studies, 38, 6, 617-628.
  8. Courgeau, D. (1985). Interaction between spatial mobility, family and career life-cycle: A French Survey. European Social Review,, 2.1, 139-162.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Ebru Kamacı

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Haziran 2014

Gönderilme Tarihi

6 Ağustos 2015

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 1970 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Kamacı, E. (2014). Kent-içi Hareketlilik ve Sosyo-Mekânsal Değişim: 2000 Yılı İstanbul’una Bir Bakış. Artium, 2(1), 1-15. https://izlik.org/JA62YJ48XR

Artium is an OAJ supported by Hasan Kalyoncu University

Open access articles in Artium are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). 

28842https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/